Table of Contents 94e1i
In doubt about which card to buy to play in Full HD? We compare to RX 6500 XT, from AMD, and the RTX 3050, from NVIDIA, and through the comments of the international expert critic, we will try to find out which of these is the best model to run games in 1080p with the best possible frame rate. 183w3l
The 2022 entry cards 372q2e
Both the RX 6500 XT and the RTX 3050 are cards that feature in the segment of entry, that is, they are the most basic models from AMD and NVIDIA, respectively, for s who intend to acquire a new graphics card, but do not have such a high budget to invest in more high-end GPUs. Anyway, the intention of both brands when launching these chips was to be able to play in Full HD.
The RTX 3050 had already first appeared on notebooks in 2021, but only earlier this year NVIDIA decided to launch its own version for desktops, and it wouldn't be crazy to expect a Ti version of the 3050 to hit the market soon, with a slight performance boost. The RX 6500 XT, on the other hand, can get a cheaper version without the XT termination to reduce its cost.
RX 6500 XT 4a4k3t
Starting the comparison with RX 6500 XT, the AMD board has a manufacturing process with 7 nanometers (nm) lithography and was developed with the RDNA 2 architecture and NAVI 24 chip, with 16 Compute Units, half of what the RX 6600 XT, for example, and this will bring a real impact on performance. Both cards were made to run in Full HD, but we will see that the RX 6500 XT ends up cutting many important requirements to present a palpable performance.
AMD's reference models—which are not sold to the public—deliver a base clock of 2610 Mhz, while the clock boost It is capable of reaching up to 2815 Mhz. However, if things were a little hazy in the specs so far, it gets worse. The newly released card has only 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM memory at only 64-bit and with a bandwidth of 144 GB/s.
In other words, that 4GB of memory will be a gigantic problem for gamers, as games are demanding more and more memory, even in Full HD. The other specifications of this type of memory are also a concern, since there will not be enough power to perform rendering and editing so smoothly. Incidentally, the card does not H264 (4K), H265 and HEVC and AV1 encoding formats.
Although this model s Ray Tracing, theoretically the card is very weak to utilize the technology, then it should not compensate. However, FidelityFX Super Resolution should give some frames more for s. The technology uses a Upscaling by taking a higher resolution image like 1080p, then downsizing it, then upscaling it again with AI and adding some filters. The big trick is the use of filters and specific software that will be applied to treat and correct imperfections in the final image.
What is the critic saying? 5c5i11
According to Tom's Hardware, AMD has gone too far in cut too many features, especially in the memory part. The review emphasizes that NVIDIA's GTX 1650 did the same thing in 2019, but maintaining a higher bandwidth, in addition to the RTX 3050 itself, which arrives with a 128-bit interface.
There was an easy middle ground I wish AMD had used: 96-bit interface and 6GB of VRAM. That would make the chip 5-10% better and increase the cost of memory, but even Nvidia – which has a reputation for being greedy – put 8GB in a chip that only costs $50 more. 6GB would have really helped in some of our tests at higher quality settings too.
Jarred Walton- Tom's Hardware
PCWorld's review also didn't touch the poor RX 6500 XT's head. The site claims that the card is a lean-time GPU due to its strange technical construction. The publication states that if the tries to force it to a higher level than it is on paper, the performance will drop a lot. This may sound silly, but the RX 6600 XT goes well beyond its specs and delivers very good numbers for what it should do. With the RX 6500 XT it doesn't seem to be the case.
With Full HD resolution, you can play E-sports games at very high frame rates or triple-A games with medium or high settings at 60fps or higher.
Brad Chacos – PCWorld
The site TechSpot even made a compilation of cuts that the RX 6500 XT suffered by AMD. The problems include serious features that would make this card palpable for the end consumer, but it ends up bringing a lot of headache.
Board cuts include:
- It is limited to PCI Express x4 bandwidth;
- It only comes with 4GB of VRAM, there is no 8GB model;
- The encoding of hardware is not ed, so you cannot use ReLive to capture gameplay, which is a deciding factor;
- As it is designed for use on laptops, only two video outputs are ed. That's for $200.
RTX 3050 2t3331
The RTX 3050 had already appeared in the world of notebooks, but the desktop version hits the market with 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM memory, 128-bit interface with a bandwidth of 224 GB/s. The manufacture of the chip that accompanies this board, the Ampere GA106-150, has an 8 nanometer lithography manufacturing process by Samsung, taking the base clock from 1320 MHz to up to 1777 MHz with the clock boost.
The RTX 3050 also has a good 2560 CUDA cores. The board has a TDP of 170W, which a 300W power supply is indicated. It is important to keep an eye out that partner models such as ASUS, Gigabyte, Gainward, PCYES, Galax, MSI and the like work with clock and/or higher frequencies, making these custom models require a little more power to function properly.
The board will also the technology Ray Tracing, present in the entire RTX family, since the 2000 generation. Ray Tracing creates more realistic lighting conditions, creating shadows and reflections that are true to what we have in real life, for example.
Of course, everything has its price. RT is a heavy technology and has a huge impact on performance, and the solution to the problem is with the Deep Learning Super Sampling 2.0, or DLSS. The feature uses Artificial Intelligence with machine learning algorithm to render the images at lower resolutions and then scale them up to a higher resolution, filling the remaining pixels with AI, resulting in a final image with excellent quality.
What is the critic saying? 5c5i11
Returning to the same vehicles to establish our head-to-head comparison of the RTX 3050 vs. the RX 6500 XT, Tom's Hardware – and the review in general – seems to have liked the RTX 3050 better. The review refers to the arrival of the board with a breather after the dubious launch of the RX 6500 XT, but the high price tag could derail things.
Nvidia's RTX 3050 offers good performance for its theoretical starting price of $249. Unfortunately, that also means there's no chance it won't sell at radically inflated prices. It sits between the previous-gen RTX 2060 and the GTX 1660 Super, both of which currently sell for much more than Nvidia's asking price.
Jarred Walton- Tom's Hardware
The PCWorld post, on the other hand, comments on NVIDIA's foray into technologies and connections that AMD decided to leave on the barbecue, such as the encoding software, and the HDMI and DisplayPort ports, which the red side simply cut to give the more headache.
AMD has eliminated several decoding and encoding functions from its GPU cost-effectively, while reducing the display outputs on the Radeon RX 6500 XT to just HDMI and DisplayPort connections. That's not the case with the RTX 3050, which comes with all the modern encoding/decoding functionality of other RTX 30 series GPUs (including AV1 ) and a full complement of video outputs.
Brad Chacos – PCWorld
Finally, the TechSpot review states that the RTX 3050 does have a very interesting performance, and significantly better than the RX 6500 XT, both in games and for other applications. The only problem would be price, which with the crisis can make this card touch the RX 6600 and RTX 3060, making its purchase unfeasible.
How desirable the GeForce RTX 3050 turns out to be will depend entirely on price and availability. If it ends up costing more than $500, it will be a big, bare hamburger; after all, you can also get the faster Radeon RX 6600.
Steve Walton – TechSpot
performance chart v56e
Here's a performance graph based on several TechSpot reviews, using a bench with an AMD Ryzen 9 5950X processor.
Which is more worth it? 6v15
After everything we've seen in this article, that old doubt may still remain. Which is more worthwhile: RTX 3050 vs RX 6500 XT? In the entry card segment, it seems to be not that difficult to choose after numerous negative comments coming from the red side.
The RX 6500 XT is definitely a card that It doesn't seem to be cost-effective. due to the lack of more robust specifications for both games and professional applications. With that, the RTX 3050 has a powerful advantage over its competitor and seems to be the best option in this scenario.
See also other features 2d1y1q
So, what did you think of the comparison of the RTX 3050 vs RX 6500 XT? Take the opportunity and also check out our comparison of RTX 3060 vs the RX 6600 XT.
